"For we are the circumcision, who worship by the spirit of God and glory in Christ Jesus and put no confidence in the FLESH. Though I myself have reason for confidence in the flesh also. If anyone else thinks he has reason for confidence in the flesh, I have more: circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Isreal, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of a Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee; as to zeal, a persecutor of the church, as to the righteousness under the law, blameless. But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ. Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worthy of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord." Philippians 3: 3-8.
I have heard a lot of outcries about grace. People protesting what they would call the "liberal" teaching of grace. They claim that God requires us to work. Work on not sinning. Work at loving better. Work to build what they would call The Kingdom.
Revealed within this concept are a few thought processes. 1) People have confidence in their flesh. They believe that they have the ability to build this so called Kingdom. 2) They don't really believe in grace. They subconsciously(or consciously) believe we are still under some sort of law.
Paul in Philippians talks about not having confidence in the flesh. He was not talking about committing what most would call sin. He was talking about having confidence in fleshy works. Working out religious do's and dont's. Working on a religious kingdom that is completely contrary to The Kingdom of God. Philippians 2:13 says, "For it is God who works in you to both will and to do for his good pleasure." What? God is the one who does the work within me? This is exactly what He does.
Ephesians 2:10 says "For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them. " So it is God works in you to both WILL and TO DO for HIS pleasure, AND we are HIS workmanship, created in Christ for good works which HE prepared beforehand. What does this mean? This means that God has already laid out the things that you WILL do. Why? Because you are HIS workmanship. The pharisee works and toils in vain, walking in dead religious works that he may take glory for himself. The saint rests in Christ. Because he knows that Christ will work in him as HE chooses, because they were set out for him before the foundation of the earth.
Religion loves to bind people in chains that Christ has broken. People will accuse you of being a wolf, of teaching cheap grace, of being an apostate. We are securely seated in Christ, who is the author and finisher of our faith. (Heb. 12:2) I will continue to teach "liberal grace" because Christ has given it liberally to me.
Friday, January 13, 2012
Saturday, November 19, 2011
The Imagined Hurdle: The Cause of My Anxiety.
Most people who get to know me well, notice I am high strung. My wife can attest to this. I like things controlled. By controlled, I mean comfortable. As soon as a little chaos enters the scene, I get stressed. When I get stressed, I get consumed by whatever happens to be stressing me out. This is what I would consider my biggest character flaw.
I have car trouble, days over for me. Somebody says something that upsets me, days over for me. The list goes on and on.
I checked my blood pressure the other day. Not good. I am now anxious about my blood pressure, which raises my blood pressure. This is problematic for somebody trying to lower it.
Lately I have been really anxious about my future, my job, my wife's job, my son's well-being, etc. I am anxious about what I can bring to the table to provide for them. I am anxious about whether or not I have what it takes to be a man that my family respects.
At the center of all these anxieties, is a single fact. I don't trust God. I don't trust him when he says my needs will be met. I don't trust him when he says that he is sovereign, and I sure as hell don't trust him when he says that my identity lies in who he is.
So as my fears unravel, I am realizing that the problem doesn't lie in the things mentioned above. It lies in my unbelief.
I look at the life of The Apostle Paul. In 2 Corinthians 11, he lays out his life for us. He spent his life being beat up. He said he received 39 lashes 5 separate times. He was thrown in prison, beaten with rods, shipwrecked 3 different times, he was stoned, eventually to death. He also said he went countless nights sleepless and in hunger. But Paul continued to trust in God's sovereignty, in God's grace, and in God's goodness. He still believed that God would provide for him.
When I say I want God to provide for my needs, I usually mean I want him to keep me comfortable. But as we see in Paul's life, this wasn't the case. He was usually anything but comfortable. But living in America, I have grown accustomed to my needs consisting of 3 large meals, a warm bed, internet, cell phones, video games etc. What a joke! "God please provide for my needs so I can be a glutton and waste my time with senseless stuff." This is what an honest prayer from my mouth would look like. There are millions of people in this world who are barely getting a healthy calorie intake for the day. But like I said, I have grown accustomed to such a lifestyle and I blame a God who "doesn't provide" when these things are taken.
When I really stop and look at my life, I have a lot to be thankful for, and very little I should really be anxious about. I start getting a little perspective when I look at the world and I realize what a spoiled child I am. I realize I need to let go of all these things that I can't control. Until I am starving, in prison, or have a mob of angry Jews throwing rocks at me, I'm going to try and relax, thanking God for all the great things I do have in my life.
I have car trouble, days over for me. Somebody says something that upsets me, days over for me. The list goes on and on.
I checked my blood pressure the other day. Not good. I am now anxious about my blood pressure, which raises my blood pressure. This is problematic for somebody trying to lower it.
Lately I have been really anxious about my future, my job, my wife's job, my son's well-being, etc. I am anxious about what I can bring to the table to provide for them. I am anxious about whether or not I have what it takes to be a man that my family respects.
At the center of all these anxieties, is a single fact. I don't trust God. I don't trust him when he says my needs will be met. I don't trust him when he says that he is sovereign, and I sure as hell don't trust him when he says that my identity lies in who he is.
So as my fears unravel, I am realizing that the problem doesn't lie in the things mentioned above. It lies in my unbelief.
I look at the life of The Apostle Paul. In 2 Corinthians 11, he lays out his life for us. He spent his life being beat up. He said he received 39 lashes 5 separate times. He was thrown in prison, beaten with rods, shipwrecked 3 different times, he was stoned, eventually to death. He also said he went countless nights sleepless and in hunger. But Paul continued to trust in God's sovereignty, in God's grace, and in God's goodness. He still believed that God would provide for him.
When I say I want God to provide for my needs, I usually mean I want him to keep me comfortable. But as we see in Paul's life, this wasn't the case. He was usually anything but comfortable. But living in America, I have grown accustomed to my needs consisting of 3 large meals, a warm bed, internet, cell phones, video games etc. What a joke! "God please provide for my needs so I can be a glutton and waste my time with senseless stuff." This is what an honest prayer from my mouth would look like. There are millions of people in this world who are barely getting a healthy calorie intake for the day. But like I said, I have grown accustomed to such a lifestyle and I blame a God who "doesn't provide" when these things are taken.
When I really stop and look at my life, I have a lot to be thankful for, and very little I should really be anxious about. I start getting a little perspective when I look at the world and I realize what a spoiled child I am. I realize I need to let go of all these things that I can't control. Until I am starving, in prison, or have a mob of angry Jews throwing rocks at me, I'm going to try and relax, thanking God for all the great things I do have in my life.
Thursday, October 6, 2011
The shoebox god.
I was told once in a debate that comparing religion to science, is like comparing apples to oranges. He went on to explain that what he meant, was that religion is faith based, (according to him, belief without evidence) and science was fact based. This is a funny statement to me. This is the way most people argue when it comes to topics of faith. Statements filled with more rhetoric than sound arguments.
My initial emotional response to statements such as these is annoyance. Annoyance, because it becomes apparent that I am being fit into a stereotype. and as much as I am guilty of placing people within other stereotypes, I hate being placed into a stereotype. The stereotype that is in place for unthinking, unintelligent religious fanatics that hold up signs protesting against gay marriage etc.
But the more I think about this statement, the more I have to agree with it. I am not a big fan of religion. Religion, gives the God that I know a bad reputation. This god, (the god of religion) is more in place to justify ones own beliefs, (political, social, moral etc) rather than the God that I know, who shows love, grace, and acceptance to people.
Some of the religious people I know, are some of the worst people I know. They use God to fill the world with hate to anybody who doesn't share the same opinions as they do. This isn't a god I want to believe in either. This is a god who is made up of anti-scientific, propaganda, who likes to take the money from people watching cable t.v.
From this stand point, I have to agree that religion is like comparing apples to oranges. But the God that I know, is the God who is the cornerstone of all knowledge. If God is real, then he cannot, by definition, be anti-scientific. He is the center of all truth.This is not a god of the gaps type god. This is the God who has created everything we understand, and everything we do not understand. Science discovers mechanisms, but mechanisms must not be confused with agency.
The problem is that as soon as I mention God, people automatically assume I am talking
about a god who fits within a system, a religion if you will. But the God who I know, does not fit within a religious system. Religion is a box that we create god to fit in, and this god, is the small minded god that we use to confirm our personal identity.
If we are a Republican, we assume God is also a Republican. If we are a Democrat, we assume God is a Democrat. If we are American, we assume God loves Americans more than he loves the rest of the world.
This is what I like to call the shoebox god. We carry him around so we never have to be challenged. After all, if the God of the universe shares my views, then who can argue with me?
But this is the religion that makes people hate god. The god who is accused of being anti-scientific, who hates homosexuals, who is going to send every non-republican to hell, and this is the reason why I hate religion.
My initial emotional response to statements such as these is annoyance. Annoyance, because it becomes apparent that I am being fit into a stereotype. and as much as I am guilty of placing people within other stereotypes, I hate being placed into a stereotype. The stereotype that is in place for unthinking, unintelligent religious fanatics that hold up signs protesting against gay marriage etc.
But the more I think about this statement, the more I have to agree with it. I am not a big fan of religion. Religion, gives the God that I know a bad reputation. This god, (the god of religion) is more in place to justify ones own beliefs, (political, social, moral etc) rather than the God that I know, who shows love, grace, and acceptance to people.
Some of the religious people I know, are some of the worst people I know. They use God to fill the world with hate to anybody who doesn't share the same opinions as they do. This isn't a god I want to believe in either. This is a god who is made up of anti-scientific, propaganda, who likes to take the money from people watching cable t.v.
From this stand point, I have to agree that religion is like comparing apples to oranges. But the God that I know, is the God who is the cornerstone of all knowledge. If God is real, then he cannot, by definition, be anti-scientific. He is the center of all truth.This is not a god of the gaps type god. This is the God who has created everything we understand, and everything we do not understand. Science discovers mechanisms, but mechanisms must not be confused with agency.
The problem is that as soon as I mention God, people automatically assume I am talking
about a god who fits within a system, a religion if you will. But the God who I know, does not fit within a religious system. Religion is a box that we create god to fit in, and this god, is the small minded god that we use to confirm our personal identity.
If we are a Republican, we assume God is also a Republican. If we are a Democrat, we assume God is a Democrat. If we are American, we assume God loves Americans more than he loves the rest of the world.
This is what I like to call the shoebox god. We carry him around so we never have to be challenged. After all, if the God of the universe shares my views, then who can argue with me?
But this is the religion that makes people hate god. The god who is accused of being anti-scientific, who hates homosexuals, who is going to send every non-republican to hell, and this is the reason why I hate religion.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Marketing off of a tragedy...9/11
Though 9/11 is well past us, I have been thinking of a couple of issues that have risen. I have been careful to fully develop my thoughts on these issues due to their controversial nature.
First off, one thing we can all agree is this, what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, was a horrible thing. Many lives were lost. Lives that have infinite value. Mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters wept that day, and continue to weep for their lost loved ones.
The issues come with the propaganda, and our mindset about the event. For example, there seems to be a mindset amongst Americans, that American lives are far more valuable then the rest of the world. We weep when American solders die, but scoff when Afghanistan soldiers die. We think nothing of it when innocent people die in Lebanon from American bombs, but when events such as 9/11 occur, we are horrified and pray for the families.
The second issue that comes to my mind is the marketing schemes centered around the tragedy of 9/11. Within the first year, Hollywood produced a film about it. Millions of well intended people spent there money to see a film that in my opinion, was only made to make a buck. We have 9/11 memorabilia such as collectible coins, shirts etc.
People often buy these items and feel good about it. What they don't understand is that they are giving their money to the wolves, who care much less about making a difference, and much more about taking advantage of gullible people. This is an act of evil. It a market that is saturated with blood money.
Now, if these items are sold to raise charity, I am all for it. What I cannot stand for, is marketing off of a tragedy. It is our responsibility to know who we are giving our money to and why.
First off, one thing we can all agree is this, what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, was a horrible thing. Many lives were lost. Lives that have infinite value. Mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters wept that day, and continue to weep for their lost loved ones.
The issues come with the propaganda, and our mindset about the event. For example, there seems to be a mindset amongst Americans, that American lives are far more valuable then the rest of the world. We weep when American solders die, but scoff when Afghanistan soldiers die. We think nothing of it when innocent people die in Lebanon from American bombs, but when events such as 9/11 occur, we are horrified and pray for the families.
The second issue that comes to my mind is the marketing schemes centered around the tragedy of 9/11. Within the first year, Hollywood produced a film about it. Millions of well intended people spent there money to see a film that in my opinion, was only made to make a buck. We have 9/11 memorabilia such as collectible coins, shirts etc.
People often buy these items and feel good about it. What they don't understand is that they are giving their money to the wolves, who care much less about making a difference, and much more about taking advantage of gullible people. This is an act of evil. It a market that is saturated with blood money.
Now, if these items are sold to raise charity, I am all for it. What I cannot stand for, is marketing off of a tragedy. It is our responsibility to know who we are giving our money to and why.
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
The emotional irrelevancy of unbelief.
In a previous blog, I spoke about the absence of belief based on a scientific bias. In this blog however, I would like to briefly discuss unbelief based on emotional irrelevancy. There seems to be a popular trend in society that loves to claim that their unbelief is based on the fact that others, who believe in a particular religion, (i.e. Christianity) may not act worthy of the beliefs themselves. For instance, I saw a "supposed" quote once by Gandhi that read like this, "I would have become a Christian if I ever met a person who acted like one."
If one's own disbelief is based on someone else's actions, I would argue that the basis for the first individuals unbelief is in fact, a weak one. I, like many others, would love to see Christians acting more like Christ (myself included). However, if I decided to base my whole worldview on how others lived up to those particular beliefs, I would be a fool. For example, most hold onto the belief that the laws of our country, are for the betterment of society. (E.g. murder, robbery, assault, etc.) If I threw out the belief that those particular laws were good, based on the fact that people committed murder, robbery, and assault, you would immediately see the flaws in my unbelief.
People are immoral, no matter what beliefs they hold. If one does not live up to their beliefs, it is less due to the fact that their beliefs are false, and more due to the fact that their character is flawed. Truth, no matter what it is, does not change based on the actions of a particular group, or individual. If it did, I would suspect it not worthy to be called truth.
If one's own disbelief is based on someone else's actions, I would argue that the basis for the first individuals unbelief is in fact, a weak one. I, like many others, would love to see Christians acting more like Christ (myself included). However, if I decided to base my whole worldview on how others lived up to those particular beliefs, I would be a fool. For example, most hold onto the belief that the laws of our country, are for the betterment of society. (E.g. murder, robbery, assault, etc.) If I threw out the belief that those particular laws were good, based on the fact that people committed murder, robbery, and assault, you would immediately see the flaws in my unbelief.
People are immoral, no matter what beliefs they hold. If one does not live up to their beliefs, it is less due to the fact that their beliefs are false, and more due to the fact that their character is flawed. Truth, no matter what it is, does not change based on the actions of a particular group, or individual. If it did, I would suspect it not worthy to be called truth.
Saturday, August 6, 2011
What makes me a christian?
Recently, I saw someone post a question on a discussion board. "What makes you a Christian?" So I did what any reasonable person would do. I asked myself that question. What does make me a Christian?
Is it believing in the Bible? That is a pretty vague question. There are numerous interpretations of the bible, on a vast amount of topics. A lot of mainstream interpretations I don't believe in. For example, some would say that the bible teaches that the earth is roughly about ten thousand years old. In my opinion, that is on the same grounds as believing that the earth is flat, or believing the holocaust never happened. Does it mean going to church? In the modern sense of the word, I morally feel conflicted going to "church". It is my conviction that church is an institution that feeds on peoples fears, to run a machine, that has been broken for a long time. Does it mean reading scripture, and praying continually? I don't line up with that either.
My mind seems to waiver day to day. Each day brings a new challenge, problem etc. There are some days that I am filled with so much intellectual doubt about my faith, that I live in a dark depressed corner in the back of my mind. So I ask myself again, what makes one a Christian?
Is it believing in the Bible? That is a pretty vague question. There are numerous interpretations of the bible, on a vast amount of topics. A lot of mainstream interpretations I don't believe in. For example, some would say that the bible teaches that the earth is roughly about ten thousand years old. In my opinion, that is on the same grounds as believing that the earth is flat, or believing the holocaust never happened. Does it mean going to church? In the modern sense of the word, I morally feel conflicted going to "church". It is my conviction that church is an institution that feeds on peoples fears, to run a machine, that has been broken for a long time. Does it mean reading scripture, and praying continually? I don't line up with that either.
My mind seems to waiver day to day. Each day brings a new challenge, problem etc. There are some days that I am filled with so much intellectual doubt about my faith, that I live in a dark depressed corner in the back of my mind. So I ask myself again, what makes one a Christian?
Well, for starters, it can't be about me. It must be about what Christ does. I am an arrogant, unloving, selfish, doubtful man, that fails to no end. There must be something more than what I can offer to God (which is nothing). If its about what I understand, accomplish, or pursue, I fail. But in Christ I see victory. Victory that may not (and most times does not) look like what I think it should. So being a Christian can't be about what I do. It must be about what Christ does.
This inevitably brings us to the next question. If being a Christian isn't about me, but is about Christ, then what does Christ do? Philippians 2:13 says "for it is God who is at work in you, to both will and to work according to his good purpose." God is the author and finisher of your faith, (Heb 12:2) we are not.
We spend so much energy trying to do "Gods" work, when maybe we should spend more time walking in faith, allowing God to do the work in which he chooses. When I was younger, I was so anxious, I could barely keep down my meals. I was anxious, because I was terrified I wasn't walking according to God's will. I was terrified that I would make a wrong decision. I wish somebody would have come beside me, handed me a beer, and comforted me with those verses. The next 5 years of my life might have been different. How can we break away from God's will, when He is the author and finisher of our faith?
We give too much credit to ourselves, while we don't give enough credit to God fulfilling his promises. We identify ourselves with these things, (good works, church, Christianity, spirituality) when we should find our identity in who Christ is.
The Christian market is saturated with books, videos, etc, that promise to make you a better Christian. The people marketing these items promise that they have discovered the secret to the "successful Christian life". Why do we spend so much time, trying to live a "good Christian life"? My life is in Christ. He will do the work in me. No longer do I have to worry about my works. God asks us to walk in faith. Not in works. Galatians 3:1-3 says "O foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you, before whose eyes was Jesus Christ publicly portrayed as crucified? This is the only thing i want to find out from you: did you receive the spirit by the works of the law, or by hearing of faith? Are you so foolish, that having begun in the spirit, are you now being perfected in the flesh?" Philippians 1:6 says "being confident in this, that he who began the good work in you, is faithful to complete it until the day of Jesus Christ."
You may ask, "are we not called to do good works?" Ephesians 2:10 says "We are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them." So first off, we are "His workmanship". Secondly, it states that God prepared good works for us beforehand, that we should walk in them. The meaning is in the details. God prepared the works. They are already set before us, by Him. As we walk in faith, the works will be accomplished. Because it is He who wills in us to work according to his good pleasure.
We are not called to be busybodies, frantically running to and fro, trying to be good Christians. We are called to rest in Christ, allowing Christ to work in us. God produces the fruit, in his timing, according to his will. So rest my friends. The work is complete. Christ has done it. We are free to rest assured, we are in Christ.
So what makes me a Christian? A better question is, Why do I care so much about being "a Christian". I am what I am.
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
A short, simple discussion, on a long, complex issue.
It amazes me what people will believe, in order to not believe in God. Constantly I see people jumping in a parade that shouts the rhetoric that the belief in God is illogical nonsense. Yet, when asked a better alternative, they have none. They may shout vague terms like "evolution". Yet they have no idea of the meaning of evolution. I believe it was Albert Einstein, who said "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing." People hear small amounts of information, and form their whole worldview on them.
I was watching a documentary that interviewed Richard Dawkins, professor of biology and best selling author of The God Delusion. When asked where life came from, of course he replied "through the evolutionary process." Which means that complex life forms evolved from simple life forms. Yet "simple life forms" are not very simple at all. Biologist know this better then anybody.
The probability of a single cell forming by random process is in the trillions.
When Dawkins was asked where the simple life forms came from, he responded that science does not know for sure. He then said that one of the theories is that a complex life form, which of course, went through an evolutionary process, came to Earth and planted it. This is the best explanation science can come up with?
One of the popular questions that people ask, to argue against god is, "who created God?". Does not the same problem lie with their theory?
People often make the mistake of believing that science is responsible for creating the scientist worldview, when the truth is, their worldview, is responsible for interpreting their science. Science, boomed in the 15th and 16th century because there was a group of men who believed the world would work under laws, because they believed in a law-giver.
So before you give up the belief in God in the name of science. Perhaps look at the other end of the argument.
I was watching a documentary that interviewed Richard Dawkins, professor of biology and best selling author of The God Delusion. When asked where life came from, of course he replied "through the evolutionary process." Which means that complex life forms evolved from simple life forms. Yet "simple life forms" are not very simple at all. Biologist know this better then anybody.
The probability of a single cell forming by random process is in the trillions.
When Dawkins was asked where the simple life forms came from, he responded that science does not know for sure. He then said that one of the theories is that a complex life form, which of course, went through an evolutionary process, came to Earth and planted it. This is the best explanation science can come up with?
One of the popular questions that people ask, to argue against god is, "who created God?". Does not the same problem lie with their theory?
People often make the mistake of believing that science is responsible for creating the scientist worldview, when the truth is, their worldview, is responsible for interpreting their science. Science, boomed in the 15th and 16th century because there was a group of men who believed the world would work under laws, because they believed in a law-giver.
So before you give up the belief in God in the name of science. Perhaps look at the other end of the argument.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)